Open trading account 
The stock market rises on days when the FOMC releases its policy statement, probably as a result of some uncertainty being removed for market participants. This pattern has existed for more than 30 years. The Fed's ability to "jawbone" the market higher is no more exceptional now than it was during any prior bull market.Morgan Stanley's (NYSE:MS) chief economist this week stated that the Fed's low-rate policy and "jawboning" are responsible for most of the stock market's gains since 2009. In doing so, Sharma is repeating the popular meme that the Fed's actions have been exceptional in pushing the market higher (from Market Watch).[/url]Market Watch On Morgan Stanley's View Of The Fed
Is this view accurate?Sharma is correct in saying the stock market typically rallies on days when the FOMC announces its policy decisions. That's not terribly surprising: [url=http://www.investing.com/economic-calendar/fed-interest-rate-decision-168]rate decisions represent some uncertainty, which is resolved with the release of the policy statement. That investors are continually uncertain about Fed policy is a testament to its ability to keep complacency in check. This is remarkable, moreover, since Fed policy very rarely changes.But where Sharma is wrong -- and this is the key point -- is in saying that the Fed's "aggressive monetary easing" and policy utterances have had an anomalous influence during the current bull market. They haven't.Quantifiable Edges has repeatedly looked at the performance of the S&P 500 on days when the FOMC policy statement is released. From 1982 to mid 2009, the average FOMC day outperformed the average of all days by 7.5 times. Gains on FOMC days were common during the 1980s, the 1990s and became more exceptional during the 2000s -- both during and after the 2003-07 bull market (chart below as of September 2009).[/url]S&P 500 On FOMC DaySince then, FOMC days have continued to be very good for the S&P 500, but less exceptional than during 2006-09. In other words, a pattern that has existed for more 30 years continues to exist (chart below as of May 2016).[url=https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-78SULj-EWaE/V-6zwe2NJmI/AAAAAAAAcw8/U3ZB2CWugbky630wW6F_HIL7wyh4Jo__gCLcB/s1600/Fed%2Bdays%2B2.png]S&P 500 On FOMC Day Through May 2016Current equity valuations are high, but only slightly more so than during 2006-2007, and much less so than during 1996-2000. The late 1960s were also similar to today. So, the assertion that price has outpaced fundamentals in any anomalous or exceptional way due to the Fed is not supported by the facts (chart from Yardeni).[url=https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-LFCYHAoeRnY/V-6978z-6sI/AAAAAAAAcxM/z_ghN0VctG4nUF3jjIsyhxojgMUcJsL7wCLcB/s1600/valuations.png][/url]Nonfinancials' PerformanceThe stock market rises on days when the FOMC releases its policy statement, probably as a result of some uncertainty being removed for market participants. This pattern has existed for more than 30 years. The Fed's ability to "jawbone" the market higher is no more exceptional now than it was during any prior bull market.
Is this view accurate?Sharma is correct in saying the stock market typically rallies on days when the FOMC announces its policy decisions. That's not terribly surprising: [url=http://www.investing.com/economic-calendar/fed-interest-rate-decision-168]rate decisions represent some uncertainty, which is resolved with the release of the policy statement. That investors are continually uncertain about Fed policy is a testament to its ability to keep complacency in check. This is remarkable, moreover, since Fed policy very rarely changes.But where Sharma is wrong -- and this is the key point -- is in saying that the Fed's "aggressive monetary easing" and policy utterances have had an anomalous influence during the current bull market. They haven't.Quantifiable Edges has repeatedly looked at the performance of the S&P 500 on days when the FOMC policy statement is released. From 1982 to mid 2009, the average FOMC day outperformed the average of all days by 7.5 times. Gains on FOMC days were common during the 1980s, the 1990s and became more exceptional during the 2000s -- both during and after the 2003-07 bull market (chart below as of September 2009).[/url]S&P 500 On FOMC DaySince then, FOMC days have continued to be very good for the S&P 500, but less exceptional than during 2006-09. In other words, a pattern that has existed for more 30 years continues to exist (chart below as of May 2016).[url=https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-78SULj-EWaE/V-6zwe2NJmI/AAAAAAAAcw8/U3ZB2CWugbky630wW6F_HIL7wyh4Jo__gCLcB/s1600/Fed%2Bdays%2B2.png]S&P 500 On FOMC Day Through May 2016Current equity valuations are high, but only slightly more so than during 2006-2007, and much less so than during 1996-2000. The late 1960s were also similar to today. So, the assertion that price has outpaced fundamentals in any anomalous or exceptional way due to the Fed is not supported by the facts (chart from Yardeni).[url=https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-LFCYHAoeRnY/V-6978z-6sI/AAAAAAAAcxM/z_ghN0VctG4nUF3jjIsyhxojgMUcJsL7wCLcB/s1600/valuations.png][/url]Nonfinancials' PerformanceThe stock market rises on days when the FOMC releases its policy statement, probably as a result of some uncertainty being removed for market participants. This pattern has existed for more than 30 years. The Fed's ability to "jawbone" the market higher is no more exceptional now than it was during any prior bull market.
