Open trading account 
At the present time, there is a "universal" discussion about the correctness of being a woman: strong, weak, self-sufficient, motivating, inspiring, or some other. And maybe, combining all these qualities?
⠀
In the animal world (and we, as you can not say, its representatives), an individual unable to feed itself is doomed to perish. And only man (!!!), evolved to such an extent that he learned to adapt to the situation.
⠀
True, such a person who has the ability to "not be able" to feed himself, in life there is a certain feature. He usually becomes addicted to someone. For example: from parents or from relatives. A woman, as a rule, dependent on men.
⠀
Therefore, in our world, a woman can not be self-sufficient. Any adult woman should be able to organize herself (and, preferably, children) a comfortable standard of living. For if she does not know how to do this, sooner or later she can get into a difficult situation.
⠀
And then the fun begins. How to be, when next to a woman there is a man? After all, if it is completely self-sufficient, then the balance is disturbed in the pair, the roles are confused and nothing good can come of it. As a rule, it happens.
⠀
Many men gladly share their responsibility with a self-sufficient woman and use this, nourishing their "I" and ironing their own male EGO. A pier, I the good fellow, all that is necessary for family I do. Although it often happens that in this family a woman does a lot for herself.
⠀
When a man appears next to a woman, not just any one, but a man who really claims to be a woman and is ready to take responsibility for her and her life (just do not treat this as simply to its banal content, here the question is wider and deeper) the situation changes slightly.
⠀
Roles and responsibilities are redistributed and become somewhat different. Everyone fulfills and carries his own. However, this does not mean that, if necessary, a woman can not again become fully self-sufficient. Not having self-sufficiency, you need to be ready for dependence. But, it suits many, of course.
⠀
Do you think, should a woman be self-sufficient or not?
⠀
In the animal world (and we, as you can not say, its representatives), an individual unable to feed itself is doomed to perish. And only man (!!!), evolved to such an extent that he learned to adapt to the situation.
⠀
True, such a person who has the ability to "not be able" to feed himself, in life there is a certain feature. He usually becomes addicted to someone. For example: from parents or from relatives. A woman, as a rule, dependent on men.
⠀
Therefore, in our world, a woman can not be self-sufficient. Any adult woman should be able to organize herself (and, preferably, children) a comfortable standard of living. For if she does not know how to do this, sooner or later she can get into a difficult situation.
⠀
And then the fun begins. How to be, when next to a woman there is a man? After all, if it is completely self-sufficient, then the balance is disturbed in the pair, the roles are confused and nothing good can come of it. As a rule, it happens.
⠀
Many men gladly share their responsibility with a self-sufficient woman and use this, nourishing their "I" and ironing their own male EGO. A pier, I the good fellow, all that is necessary for family I do. Although it often happens that in this family a woman does a lot for herself.
⠀
When a man appears next to a woman, not just any one, but a man who really claims to be a woman and is ready to take responsibility for her and her life (just do not treat this as simply to its banal content, here the question is wider and deeper) the situation changes slightly.
⠀
Roles and responsibilities are redistributed and become somewhat different. Everyone fulfills and carries his own. However, this does not mean that, if necessary, a woman can not again become fully self-sufficient. Not having self-sufficiency, you need to be ready for dependence. But, it suits many, of course.
⠀
Do you think, should a woman be self-sufficient or not?